Blackwell Reference Online

Extract

iconoclasm and idolatry Assaults against images occur in all cultures. In analysing the various forms of aggression against images, one may want to distinguish between acts of vandalism (including acts of war), pathological or psychotic violence, and destruction or mutilation for reasons of principle (political or religious); but in practice the motives are much less clear and much more difficult to unravel. There is also more of a continuum than may first be apparent between spontaneous acts of individual violence and concerted and organized group hostility. In situations where public or theological motives are adduced for the iconoclastic deed or event, individual psychological motives may well appear to receive a kind of legitimation in the social, legal, theological or philosophical domain. The term ‘iconoclasm’ is popularly used in a metaphorical sense; it will not be so discussed here. At issue are physical acts against physical images, whether two- or three-dimensional, and sometimes buildings. The more clearly definable motivations for iconoclasm include the following: the desire for publicity (as in the locus clas-sicus of this motivation, the destruction of the temple of Diana at Ephesus by Erato-stratos, and in any number of psychopathic assaults on images in the twentieth century, where the targets have been exceptionally well known works of art); the fear of the life ... log in or subscribe to read full text