Full Text

Civil Rights Act of 1991

David P. Twomey


Between 1989 and 1991 the US Supreme Court reoriented Title VII jurisprudence to favor employers. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 (CRA 1991) modified or reversed these decisions, augmented the types of damages available to plaintiffs, and provided for jury trials in cases of intentional discrimination . In a disparate treatment (intentional discrimination) case, the plaintiff must prove discriminatory intent. Section 105 of CRA 1991 set forth the burden of proof for disparate impact (facially neutral employment practices that have an adverse impact on a protected group) cases, codifying the concepts of business necessity and job‐relatedness enunciated in griggs v. duke power, 401 us 424 ( 1971 ). A new shifting burden of proof scheme resulted: 1 the plaintiff must demonstrate through relevant statistical comparisons that a particular employment practice used in selecting or promoting employees causes a disparate impact; 2 the defending employer may then proceed to demonstrate that a particular employment practice does not cause the disparate impact; or 3 the defending employer must demonstrate (with the burden of persuasion, not just production of evidence) that the challenged practice is job‐related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity. Victims of discrimination are entitled to be made whole, including backpay and benefits , less their ... log in or subscribe to read full text

Log In

You are not currently logged-in to Blackwell Reference Online

If your institution has a subscription, you can log in here:


     Forgotten your password?

Find out how to subscribe.

Your library does not have access to this title. Please contact your librarian to arrange access.

[ access key 0 : accessibility information including access key list ] [ access key 1 : home page ] [ access key 2 : skip navigation ] [ access key 6 : help ] [ access key 9 : contact us ] [ access key 0 : accessibility statement ]

Blackwell Publishing Home Page

Blackwell Reference Online ® is a Blackwell Publishing Inc. registered trademark
Technology partner: Semantico Ltd.

Blackwell Publishing and its licensors hold the copyright in all material held in Blackwell Reference Online. No material may be resold or published elsewhere without Blackwell Publishing's written consent, save as authorised by a licence with Blackwell Publishing or to the extent required by the applicable law.

Back to Top